Law Nerd LLC helps attorneys prepare, oppose, and refine dispositive motions—including traditional and no-evidence summary judgments, Rule 91a motions to dismiss, pleas to the jurisdiction, and federal Rule 12 and Rule 56 motions.
The focus is not just writing polished briefs. The focus is identifying the controlling elements, matching arguments to the record, preserving objections, avoiding waiver, and presenting the issue in a way the court can adopt.
A dispositive motion can end a case before trial. A summary judgment, motion to dismiss, or plea to the jurisdiction forces the court to decide whether the case—or a specific claim—survives. The party that frames the issue most clearly, matches the legal standard, and ties arguments to competent evidence usually controls the outcome.
Many attorneys lose at this stage not because the law was against them, but because the issue was not presented in a form the court could use. A response that tells the story but fails to identify the challenged elements, cite the right evidence, or preserve the right objections may be legally insufficient regardless of the underlying facts.
As a former court staff attorney, I evaluated dispositive motions from the court's perspective. I know what makes a motion persuasive and what makes a response legally sufficient. That perspective informs every motion and response Law Nerd LLC produces:
Traditional summary judgment requires the movant to prove entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. No-evidence summary judgment shifts the burden to the nonmovant to produce more than a scintilla of evidence on specifically challenged elements. Law Nerd LLC handles both sides—drafting motions that target the weakest elements and responses that raise genuine fact issues with competent evidence.
Rule 91a allows dismissal when a cause of action has no basis in law or fact. Unlike federal 12(b)(6) motions, Texas Rule 91a has specific procedural requirements including a mandatory hearing timeline and fee-shifting provisions. Law Nerd LLC helps attorneys navigate the procedural requirements while building substantive arguments.
A plea to the jurisdiction challenges the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. Common in cases involving governmental entities, standing issues, and ripeness disputes. Because jurisdiction is a threshold question, a successful plea ends the case without reaching the merits.
Federal motion practice operates under different standards—Twombly/Iqbal plausibility for motions to dismiss, Celotex burden-shifting for summary judgment. Law Nerd LLC handles federal dispositive motions with attention to the distinct procedural and substantive standards that govern federal practice.
Opposing counsel filed a no-evidence summary judgment challenging three elements of your client's claim. You need to identify competent evidence in the record for each element, attach it properly, and preserve objections to the movant's evidence—all within 21 days.
Your client has a strong case on the law, but the motion needs to be airtight. You need element-by-element proof, properly authenticated exhibits, and legal analysis that anticipates every response argument.
A governmental entity filed a plea claiming immunity. The response requires navigating sovereign immunity doctrines, ultra vires exceptions, and jurisdictional evidence—often with limited time.
Law Nerd LLC provides flat-fee briefing support for summary judgments, motions to dismiss, and pleas to the jurisdiction. Rush turnaround available.
Get in Touch